This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wackernagel, M. Articles by Thomas, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Ecological Footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand

SAGE at the University of Wisconsin–Madison; Centre for Sustainability Studies in Veracruz, Mexico; Global Footprint Network, 3270 Lakeshore Avenue, Oakland, CA 94610-2720, USA; tel: +1 510 839 8879 info{at}footprintnetwork.org

Justin Kitzes

Dan Moran

Steven Goldfinger

Mary Thomas

Global Footprint Network, 3270 Lakeshore Avenue, Oakland, CA 94610-2720, USA; tel: +1 510 839 8879 info{at}footprintnetwork.org

Cities and regions depend on resources and ecological services from distant ecosystems. The well-being of city and region residents is affected by both the health and availability of these ecosystems, especially in today's ecologically strained world. The management of a city or region's resource metabolism, including the natural capital that supports these flows, is becoming increasingly a central concern to cities and regions that want to succeed. Urban infrastructure is long-lasting and influences resource needs for decades to come: which cities are building future resource traps, and which are opportunities for resource-efficient and more competitive lifestyles? Reliable measures comparing the supply of natural capital to human demand are indispensable for managing resource metabolism, as they help identify challenges, set targets, track progress and drive policies for sustainability. This paper describes one such measurement tool: the Ecological Footprint. After explaining the assumptions behind the Footprint and describing some representative findings, it provides examples of how this resource accounting tool can assist local governments in managing their ecological assets, and support their sustainability efforts.

Key Words: Ecological Footprint • regional governance • resource accounts • sustainability

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 18, No. 1, 103-112 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0956247806063978


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Chance Towards sustainable residential communities; the Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED) and beyond Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2009; 21(2): 527 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Dodman Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories Environment and Urbanization, April 1, 2009; 21(1): 185 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]